← Back to directory
For vendors

How vendors work with AI Governance Vendors

This site is editorial first. Vendors can submit sources, request corrections, and explore commercial programs, but editorial pages are still written to help buyers make sense of the market rather than to mirror vendor marketing.

What vendors can do

Submit a missing vendor, request a correction, send stronger framework evidence, suggest category pages, or ask about clearly labeled commercial placements.

What improves your odds of a strong listing

Dedicated framework pages, product-level documentation, explicit workflow descriptions, and proof that your platform supports real governance operations rather than broad trustworthy-AI positioning.

What does not help

Generic positioning decks, broad feature lists without source pages, implied framework support, or pushing for language that cannot be supported from your public materials.

Editorial vs commercial

Editorial summaries and category placement are based on fit and evidence. Commercial opportunities, if used, should be labeled separately and should not change the underlying editorial methodology.

Commercial options in practice

The early model is intentionally narrow: a small number of labeled homepage, category, and targeted spotlight placements. Starter ranges live on Featured listings. If your product is not already a strong fit for the taxonomy, commercial placement is not the right first step.

Best next step for vendors

If you are not listed, start with Submit a vendor. If you are listed and something is wrong, use Contact with the exact page and primary-source correction. If you want more visibility, review Featured listings.

Response expectation

High-signal submissions and corrections are easier to process than open-ended pitches. If you want a stronger page, make the evidence easy to verify.